7 Mistakes You’re Making with ServiceNow ITOM (and How to Fix Them)
- SnowGeek Solutions
- 7 hours ago
- 5 min read
As we navigate the complexities of 2026, the landscape of IT Operations Management (ITOM) has shifted from being a "nice-to-have" visibility tool to the literal backbone of the autonomous enterprise. With the release of ServiceNow Xanadu and the refinements in the Washington family, the stakes have never been higher. I have witnessed firsthand how a well-oiled ITOM engine can elevate a company to unprecedented heights of efficiency, yet I also see many organizations stumbling over the same avoidable hurdles.
In my role at SnowGeek Solutions, I’ve audited dozens of implementations where the platform was capable of greatness, but the execution was anchored by legacy thinking. Whether you are aiming to satisfy stringent EU regulations like DORA and GDPR or looking to maximize ROI through Agentic AI in the US market, avoiding these seven critical mistakes is non-negotiable.
This guide will walk you through the essential steps to transform your ITOM environment into a seamless success story.
1. Treating ITOM and ITAM as Separate Initiatives
One of the most pervasive errors I encounter is the "silo" mentality. Many organizations hire a ServiceNow implementation partner to deploy ITOM Discovery while a completely different team manages ITAM (IT Asset Management).
When these are treated as separate projects, your Configuration Management Database (CMDB) accuracy typically plateaus around 60-70%. In 2026, a 30% error rate in your CMDB isn't just a nuisance: it’s a compliance nightmare under DORA. If you don't know exactly what software is running on which server, you cannot guarantee operational resilience.
The Fix: Integrate ITOM and ITAM from inception. By leveraging Service Graph Connectors and the latest Discovery patterns in the Washington release, you unify data collection with CMDB enrichment. This holistic approach can improve Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) by up to 40%. I’ve seen top-tier implementations achieve sub-2-hour MTTR for Priority 2 incidents simply because the asset data and operational health were visible in a single pane of glass.

2. Ignoring the Power of Agentic AI and AIOps
In the Xanadu release, ServiceNow introduced advanced Agentic AI capabilities that allow the system to not just alert you to a problem, but to autonomously investigate and suggest remediations. A common mistake is sticking to traditional, threshold-based monitoring.
If your team is still manually triaging thousands of "noise" alerts, you are leaving massive ROI on the table. You are paying for a Ferrari but driving it like a lawnmower.
The Fix: Transition to AI-driven operations. Use ServiceNow’s AIOps to correlate events and suppress noise. This isn't just about technical flair; it’s about human impact. By reducing alert fatigue, you allow your engineers to focus on strategic innovation rather than "keeping the lights on." This shift is essential for US-based firms looking to maximize their platform ROI in 2026.
3. Insufficient User Acceptance Testing (UAT) and Validation
I cannot stress this enough: cutting corners on UAT is the fastest way to drive support costs up by 200-300% in the first quarter after go-live. I have seen complex Discovery patterns fail because they weren't tested against specific Linux variants or edge-case cloud configurations.
The Fix: Implement "Guided UAT." Don't just hand a spreadsheet to your users. Run structured, interactive testing sessions that simulate real-world scenarios. Ensure your ServiceNow consulting services provider includes rigorous validation of automated workflows. Before you go live, you need to know exactly how the system behaves when an approver is out of the office or when a mid-server loses connectivity.
4. Failing to Contextualize for Industry-Specific Requirements (DORA/ESG)
Applying a generic "out-of-the-box" configuration is a mistake that costs companies 30-40% of their potential platform ROI. In 2026, your ITOM strategy must reflect your regulatory reality.
For our European clients, ITOM is now a primary tool for DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance. For global firms, tracking the energy consumption of data centers via ITOM is now a core part of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting.
The Fix: Map your ITOM workflows to your industry. If you are in financial services, your incident response must be hard-coded with DORA reporting timelines. If you are in manufacturing, your Discovery must extend into OT (Operational Technology) environments. We at SnowGeek Solutions specialize in these "last mile" customizations that turn a generic tool into a strategic asset.

5. Lacking In-House ServiceNow Expertise
Relying solely on an external ServiceNow implementation partner without building internal competency is a recipe for technical debt. When the partner leaves, who manages the governance? Who ensures that the automation doesn't break during the next ServiceNow upgrade?
The Fix: Invest in your people. Use ServiceNow’s free on-demand resources and pair them with structured training from experts. Define clear internal roles: who is the Strategic lead for financial decisions, and who is the Technical lead for best practices? A well-governed platform is a healthy platform. You can check your current health and identify gaps with a Free 2026 ServiceNow ROI & License Audit.
6. Poor Planning for Data Migration and Management
"Garbage in, garbage out" remains the golden rule of CMDB. Importing millions of legacy records without a cleansing strategy is the quickest way to make your ServiceNow instance unusable. I’ve seen ITOM projects stall for months because the system was choked by duplicate records and incomplete CI (Configuration Item) data.
The Fix: Conduct a comprehensive data audit before you migrate. Identify duplicates, fix formatting issues, and: most importantly: only migrate what you actually need. Use the Data Content Manager or similar tools to maintain data hygiene post-migration. Remember, a lean, accurate CMDB is infinitely more valuable than a massive, "dirty" one.
7. Weak Governance and Architectural Planning
Without a roadmap, ITOM implementations quickly spiral into a chaotic mess of "quick fixes" and unmanageable backlogs. I have seen organizations treat ITOM as a technical "install" rather than what it actually is: a fundamental change to your operating model.
The Fix: Establish a three-tier governance structure:
Strategic: Financial and ROI oversight.
Demand: Prioritizing which features to roll out next.
Technical: Ensuring every customization follows ServiceNow's "Architectural Best Practices."
By treating ITOM as an evolving operating model, you ensure that your investment continues to deliver value long after the initial implementation.
The Path to Operational Excellence
The complexities of 2026 demand a level of precision that legacy ITOM strategies simply cannot provide. Whether you are struggling with CMDB accuracy, failing to meet DORA requirements, or feeling overwhelmed by the licensing costs of the Xanadu release, remember that these challenges are actually opportunities in disguise.
At SnowGeek Solutions, we don't just "install" software. We partner with you to ensure your ServiceNow journey is a transformative success story. Our consultative, data-driven approach is designed to streamline your workflows, reduce costs, and maximize the potential of your IT landscape.
Ready to stop making these mistakes and start seeing real results?
Get your Roadmap: Visit the SnowGeek Solutions contact page to share your project details. I will personally review your requirements to see how we can elevate your ITOM strategy.
Stay Ahead of the Curve: Register with SnowGeek Solutions for platform updates, expert insights, and exclusive deep dives into the latest ServiceNow releases.
Claim Your Audit: Don't leave your ROI to chance. Apply for our Free 2026 ServiceNow ROI & License Audit to uncover hidden savings and optimize your platform health today.
Your journey toward operational excellence demands strategic foresight. Let’s build that future together.

Comments